What state law permits, prohibits, or redirects to designated agency / transaction brokerage in 2026 — and the consent workflow that holds up to a real estate commission review
Dual agency — one brokerage representing both buyer and seller in the same transaction — is permitted in most US states with written disclosure and informed consent, but the rules vary widely. A handful of states (Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Texas, and Vermont have historically had restrictions or alternatives like 'transaction broker' / 'intermediary') treat the relationship differently, often through 'transaction brokerage' or 'designated agency' alternatives that avoid the strict dual-agency label. The NAR settlement (August 2024) did not abolish dual agency but added a written buyer agreement requirement that interacts with it. BuildMyListing surfaces the state-appropriate disclosure language and tracks consent timing.
Pricing: Starting $99/month
Time Required: 5 minutes when dual agency arises
Most agents learned 'dual agency' in licensing class as a single concept. Real-world 2026 practice is more varied: some states require it to be disclosed and consented to in writing before either side gets representation services; others permit only 'designated agency' where the brokerage assigns separate licensees to each party; a few states prohibit traditional dual agency and require 'transaction brokerage' or 'intermediary' status; the NAR settlement added a written buyer agreement layer on top.
BuildMyListing flags potential dual-agency situations at intake, surfaces the state-appropriate disclosure language (true dual agency, designated agency, transaction brokerage, or intermediary), and captures written consent with timestamps so the consent timing is unambiguous.
Each state's preferred relationship model is mapped — Colorado transaction brokerage, Texas intermediary, Florida transaction broker default, Kansas transaction broker, and the dual-agency-permitting majority. The right disclosure surfaces automatically.
Benefit: No more using a California consent form in Florida
Consent is captured in writing with date, time, and the parties' acknowledgments. The consent record sits in the listing or transaction file.
Benefit: Consent timing is unambiguous if questioned
Where the brokerage uses designated representation instead of dual agency, the workflow tracks which licensee represents which party, with the brokerage as the umbrella.
Benefit: Designated representation is documented, not assumed
Post-August 2024 written buyer agreement requirements interact with dual agency disclosure. BuildMyListing prompts for both as separate-but-related documents.
Benefit: Settlement compliance + agency disclosure together
When a buyer expresses interest in a property listed by the same brokerage, the workflow flags the agency question.
BuildMyListing presents the disclosure form or language the state requires — dual agency consent, designated agency notice, transaction brokerage disclosure, or intermediary acknowledgment.
Written consent is captured with timestamps. Where required, separate consents are obtained from buyer and seller before any substantive representation services.
| State Pattern | Example States | What's Permitted/Required | How BuildMyListing Handles It |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dual agency permitted with written consent | Most states (illustrative: Pennsylvania, Ohio, Washington, Massachusetts, North Carolina) | Both parties' written consent before representation services | Consent forms + timestamps |
| Transaction brokerage default or alternative | Colorado, Florida, Kansas | Transaction broker / non-agent facilitator role instead of dual agency | Transaction brokerage workflow |
| Intermediary status | Texas | Texas intermediary status (TREC) with written consent and designated licensees | Texas intermediary workflow |
| Designated representation | Many states permit alongside dual agency (Virginia, New Jersey, Illinois, others) | Brokerage designates separate licensees for each party | Designated rep workflow tracks assignments |
| Effectively prohibited or strongly limited | A small number of states have historically restricted; check current statute | Use designated agency or alternative | Workflow defaults to permitted alternative |
| Post-settlement overlay | All NAR-affiliated markets | Written buyer agreement before tour (NAR settlement, August 17, 2024) | Buyer agreement prompt independent of agency disclosure |
Scenario: Pennsylvania brokerage where the listing agent is approached by a buyer on their own listing.
Process: Workflow flags potential dual agency → Pennsylvania-form disclosure surfaced → both parties' written consent captured before substantive representation
Compliance: Pennsylvania dual-agency consent timing requirements are met. Consent is unambiguous.
Scenario: Texas brokerage with a buyer interested in a property the same brokerage lists.
Process: Workflow flags potential intermediary → Texas-form Information About Brokerage Services + Intermediary Notice surfaced → written consent captured → designated licensees assigned
Compliance: Texas intermediary status is established consistent with TREC rules. Each party has a designated licensee.
Scenario: Colorado brokerage operating under transaction brokerage as default.
Process: Workflow defaults to transaction broker disclosure → Colorado transaction broker notice issued → relationship documented in writing
Compliance: Colorado's transaction brokerage framework reflected. No accidental dual-agency exposure.
Transform your listing photos with AI-powered enhancement and automatic AB 723 compliance tracking.
Join the Waitlist